Cura para la influenze, fiebre porcina, H1N1, Tipo A, Swine Flu… Como la quieran llamar

 

http://www.NaturalNews.com/026378_anti-viral_health_Health_Ranger.html

(NaturalNews) The Health Ranger, a proponent of nutritional education for the public, has overcome the censorship efforts of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and published a free, non-commercial guide that reveals five powerful anti-viral remedies that can help protect people from influenza pandemics.
The full, free report is entitled The Five Best Anti-Viral Products to Beat Influenza, Swine Flu, Bird Flu and SARS and is available here: http://www.naturalnews.com/RR-FiveBestAnti-ViralProducts.html
Recently, the FDA sent out a wave of intimidating warning letters to nutritional supplement companies, threatening them with seizure of their products and criminal prosecutions if they dare mention H1N1 Influenza (Swine Flu) in conjunction with their anti-viral products. This censorship campaign is clearly an effort to wipe clean common knowledge about medicinal herbs from the minds of the People, forcing them to be dependent on vaccines, pharmaceuticals and conventional health "authorities" who already admit their vaccines won't work for future mutations of influenza.
To combat the FDA's "information cleansing" campaign, the Health Ranger has gone public with his five top recommended anti-viral remedies. Notably, the Health Ranger has no financial ties to any of the products he recommends in this report. His entire report (http://www.naturalnews.com/RR-FiveBestAnti-ViralProducts.html) is non-commercial speech protected by the Free Speech provisions of the United States Constitution.
This NaturalNews free report covers:
• Why the FDA, CDC and even the natural products industry doesn't want you to learn this information.
• Why conventional medicines and vaccines will utterly fail in a pandemic.
• The top five anti-viral remedies recommended by the Health Ranger.
• Exact links where you can acquire most of these recommended anti-viral products right now.
• Four additional natural remedies offering powerful anti-viral properties.
• Why the greatest killer in the next big pandemic will be ignorance! (And how to stay alive by staying informed.)
• How health authorities try to dumb down the people, turning them into victims instead of self-reliant citizens.
• The top five things that can kill you during a pandemic (Warning: You may be taking one or more of these things right now...)
• The real reason why plants offer such powerful anti-viral medicine.
... and more. Read the full report here: http://www.naturalnews.com/RR-FiveBestAnti-ViralProducts.html
Empowering people with the truth about natural medicine
"The publication of this report is about empowering people with potentially lifesaving information that the FDA has, at every opportunity, attempted to destroy," said Mike Adams, the report author and editor of NaturalNews.com. "By keeping the American public ignorant of the natural anti-viral properties of medicinal plants, U.S. health authorities have signed the death warrants for countless victims in the next great pandemic," Adams added.
"It is a crime against the People to purposely keep them ignorant of this knowledge, especially given the importance of this knowledge in protecting their lives in a scenario where conventional medicines run out and the hospitals are overflowing with the sick and dying," Adams says.
Readers are urged to read the report now, well in advance of the next big pandemic, as acquiring the anti-viral products mentioned in the report will be next to impossible once a pandemic starts to produce mass fatalities (and the people get panicked).
The pipeline of available anti-viral products is very small compared to conventional pharmaceuticals, but those who prepare early will be ahead of the game and well protected with additional anti-viral medicines made by Mother Nature instead of Big Pharma.
"I'm not against using Tamiflu if you can get it," Adams says. "But people need to have more than one option for protecting themselves, especially given that Tamiflu comes from a medicinal herb in the first place, and it's only one of thousands of herbs that possess powerful anti-viral properties."
The U.S. government currently has enough Tamiflu to treat roughly one out of six Americans. There are currently no other treatment options for the other five out of six Americans who may be infected in a pandemic.
There is currently no vaccine for swine flu, and by the time a vaccine is manufactured and distributed, the virus will likely have mutated in the wild, rendering the vaccine useless.
In the next pandemic, Americans who follow the advice of the FDA, CDC and Big Pharma may pay for their foolishly misplaced faith with their lives.
Read more in the full report here: http://www.naturalnews.com/RR-FiveBestAnti-ViralProducts.html

Health Ranger Reveals the Five Most Powerful Anti-Viral Remedies for Influenza and Swine Flu in Free Report

Radiation Treatment for Breast Cancer Causes Cancer in the Other Breast

 

Impresionante esta noticia

http://www.NaturalNews.com/026257.html

(NaturalNews) Young women who receive radiation treatment after breast cancer surgery are significantly more likely to later develop cancer in the other breast than women who did not undergo such radiation.

The findings come from a study, published online in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, on more than 7,000 women who were treated for breast cancer in Netherlands between the years of 1970 and 1986. All study participants were diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 71.

Among study participants in general, the risk of developing cancer in the opposite breast (contralateral breast cancer) after treatment in the first breast was three to four times higher than the rate for new cases of breast cancer. This risk only went up with a number of other risk factors, including family predisposition or treatment with radiation or chemotherapy.

Researchers from the Erasmus Medical Center Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center in Rotterdam examined the cancer risk in women based on whether they were treated with radiation after a lumpectomy (partial breast removal) or mastectomy (complete breast removal). They found that women under the age of 45 who received radiation treatment after a lumpectomy were 1.5 times more likely to develop contralateral cancer than women who received post-mastectomy radiation treatment.

Similarly, the risk of contralateral breast cancer among all patients under the age of 45 increased by 9 percent if they had received radiation treatment. Among women treated before the age of 35, the increase in risk associated with radiation therapy was far higher -- 78 percent.
When the participants were examined all together and not divided by age, there was no correlation between radiation treatment and increased cancer risk.

Radiation treatment is commonly used after the surgical removal of cancerous breast tissue in order to kill any cancerous cells that might remain. It is used most often after any lumpectomy, after any mastectomy of a breast that contained a tumor larger than five centimeters, or in any cancer that has spread to the lymph nodes.
The chemotherapy drugs cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil and methotrexate also increased the risk of contraleteral cancer, but only after five years. Within the first five years after treatment, there was no difference in contralateral cancer rates between those who had received the drugs and those who had not.

To date, many researchers have assumed that high rates of contralateral breast cancer can be mostly attributed to the risk factors that contributed to the original cancer, such as genetic predisposition. This study is one of the first to suggest that cancer treatment itself might also increase risk.

That family predisposition affects breast cancer risk is fairly well accepted by researchers, and scientists have identified two genetic mutations in particular (BRCA1 and BRCA2) that seem to play a role. In the current study, the highest risk of contralateral cancer was seen among women who had three or more relatives who had already had breast cancer. But such predispositions appear to have the greatest effect in the presence of environmental risk factors.

In the current study, young women who had received post-lumpectomy radiation treatment and who also had a strong history of breast cancer in their family had their risk of contralateral cancer increased by 3.5 times.
The researchers did not test participants for the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Study author Maartje J. Hooning said that her study has immediate implications for cancer treatment.

"[Although] radiation techniques of today will lead to a lower dose to the contralateral breast than the techniques presented in our study, treating clinicians should be aware of the existing dose-response relationship for risk of contralateral breast cancer. Especially in young women, the radiation dose to the contralateral breast should be kept as low as possible."

Breast cancer is the world's second most common and fifth most lethal cancer. Women in the United States have the highest rate of the disease worldwide.

Sources for this story include: www.washingtonpost.com.

Radiation Treatment for Breast Cancer Causes Cancer in the Other Breast